The Wizard Nebula, NGC 7380, in Cepheus — a glowing pink, white and rust-brown cloud shaped like a robed wizard against a dense star field, stacked in StackingWizard and processed in AstroWizard
NGC 7380, the Wizard Nebula — 1,682 × 30s subs (14 hr 1 min) on a Seestar S50 Pro at Astro Peak Observatory, stacked in StackingWizard and finished in AstroWizard with the RC Astro XTerminator tools.

Fourteen hours. 1,682 thirty-second subs off my Seestar S50 Pro at Astro Peak. That's what went into this one — and honestly, the processing was the easy part. It felt only right to run the Wizard Nebula through StackingWizard and AstroWizard, so I figured it was time to write up where these two apps came from, how they actually work, and why they've become the backbone of everything I post here.

Who's Behind the Wizard Apps

Both apps come from Luke Newbould, the astrophotographer and YouTuber better known as Lukomatico. If you've ever watched one of his processing tutorials, you already get the philosophy — his own site says he believes "the magic of astrophotography should be for everyone," and that processing "shouldn't require a second monitor full of documentation." That second line is basically my entire relationship with PixInsight summed up in one sentence.

Here's the part that still surprises people: both apps are completely free. No ads, no tracking, no account to sign up for. Luke funds development through a tip jar, Patreon, and affiliate links to the RC Astro tools (more on those below). They run on Windows 10/11, macOS (Apple Silicon and Intel), and now Linux too. Both are still officially in open beta, and the update pace is wild — AstroWizard's latest build and StackingWizard's Beta 4.7.1 "Moonrise" both landed on October 7, just a couple days after the Beta 4.7 "Vanishing Act" release.

I wrote about AstroWizard back in September when I compared it against Siril and PixInsight. Since then I've added StackingWizard to the front of the workflow, so this is the full pipeline from raw subs to finished photo — all in the Wizard family.

Step One: StackingWizard Does the Heavy Lifting

Before you can edit anything, all those individual subs need to be calibrated, aligned, and combined into one clean master image. That's StackingWizard's job, and its tagline is pretty much the pitch: "stack your subs, simply." You point it at your frames, it walks you through each stage, and you get a stack you can hand straight off to AstroWizard.

A few things that matter for a dataset like this one:

Step Two: AstroWizard Walks You Through the Edit

AstroWizard takes a stacked FITS, TIFF, or XISF file — from StackingWizard, a Seestar, a Dwarf, Siril, DeepSkyStacker, whatever — and breaks processing into nine guided steps, each one with a live preview and an undo button:

  1. Load your image
  2. Crop the edges
  3. Remove the gradient
  4. Balance the color
  5. Sharpen
  6. Reduce noise
  7. The Big Stretch
  8. Make it beautiful
  9. Export & share

Under the hood it's pulling in some serious tools — GraXpert (free) for gradient removal and AI denoising, StarNet2 (free) for star removal, and built-in stretching math based on published PixelMath expressions by Bill Blanshan and Juan Conejero. You don't have to know any of that to use it, though. That's the whole point.

Watch the Whole Edit, Start to Finish 🎬

This is the part I'm most excited to share. Here's the full replay of the Wizard Nebula edit — 21 steps, from the raw stack "As loaded" (basically a flat green-gray field with a faint pink smudge) all the way through color calibration, the starless work, and the final polish with the stars recombined.

46 seconds, 21 steps: the Wizard Nebula going from raw stack to finished image in AstroWizard.

Watch the jump between "As loaded" and the color calibration step — that's where the Wizard first shows up as more than a smudge. Then once the stars come off, you can see the nebula getting shaped on its own before they go back in at the very end.

Where the RC Astro Tools Plug In

The free tools inside AstroWizard are genuinely good. But I run it with the three RC Astro machine-learning tools plugged in, and this is where my results took a real jump:

The big change is that RC Astro now offers these as stand-alone tools — they don't need PixInsight or Photoshop anymore, and AstroWizard is one of the programs that works with them directly. All three come as a $189.85 bundle, and each one has a free trial, so you can see the difference on your own data before you spend anything. They're the only paid part of this workflow.

The Wizard, Pulled Apart

Here's what StarXTerminator actually hands you. On the left is the starless layer — just the nebula, with all those dark dust lanes and the rust-colored edges finally readable without thousands of stars on top. On the right is the stars-only layer. Look closely at the middle of that one and you can see the open cluster at the heart of the nebula as a sprinkle of bluish stars.

Starless version of the Wizard Nebula NGC 7380, showing only the glowing pink, white and rust-brown gas and dark dust lanes on a black background Stars-only layer of the Wizard Nebula field, a dense star field with a loose cluster of bluish stars near the center where the nebula sits
Left: starless layer · Right: stars-only layer — both split out with StarXTerminator inside AstroWizard, then recombined for the final image.

What You're Actually Looking At 🔭

NGC 7380 sits in Cepheus, roughly 7,000+ light-years away, and gets its nickname from the shape — a hunched wizard in a robe with his pointy hat at the top left, leaning over something. Once you see him you can't unsee him. It was discovered by Caroline Herschel back in 1787.

It's a star-forming region wrapped around a young open cluster (also cataloged as NGC 7380). The hot, young stars in that cluster are pumping out the radiation that makes the surrounding hydrogen glow, and they're slowly eating away at the cloud they were born from. Those dark, ragged lanes along the wizard's "robe" are dense dust that hasn't been blown away yet — exactly the kind of detail BlurXTerminator helped bring out.

Why This Workflow Works for Me

I've been honest about this before: PixInsight has a higher ceiling, and if you love the deep technical side of processing, it's worth the time. But I don't want to spend my free time reading documentation — I want to get the shot out to you, onto the site, and onto Instagram while I'm still excited about it.

"StackingWizard, AstroWizard, and the three XTerminators get me good photos without the steep learning curve. For me, that's the whole game."

If you've been sitting on a hard drive full of subs because processing feels like a wall, start here. Download both apps (free), grab the RC Astro trials, and run one dataset through all the way. I think you'll be surprised what's been hiding in your data.

Tools used: StackingWizard + AstroWizard · RC Astro BlurXTerminator, StarXTerminator, NoiseXTerminator
Data: Seestar S50 Pro · 1,682 × 30s (14 hr 1 min) · Astro Peak Observatory, southern Utah

Sources: AstroWizard / StackingWizard (Lukomatico) · RC Astro product pages and pricing (checked Oct 16, 2026)

Wizard Nebula NGC 7380 AstroWizard StackingWizard RC Astro Astro Peak · Utah